Entry tags:
US Senate - the anti-incumbency state
There's a state in the US where, since the 1960s, only one US Senator has been re-elected. He got re-elected several times, and was quite notorious in his day, so you might've heard of him, but he's been gone for a while now*. Do you know which state (and which Senator they did re-elect)?
Or, do you have a guess? If so, leave a comment before you Google or read other comments, I'm curious.
* edit: "a while" means more than just a couple of years :) Long enough that we already know his successor served only one term.
Edit2: To clarify, that one Senator they re-elected a few times was the exception - this state's pattern has been to not re-elect Senators. From 1970 - present, no Senator in this state except that one exception, has been elected more than once (or elected even once, if they were already serving due to being first elected before 1970).
Or, do you have a guess? If so, leave a comment before you Google or read other comments, I'm curious.
* edit: "a while" means more than just a couple of years :) Long enough that we already know his successor served only one term.
Edit2: To clarify, that one Senator they re-elected a few times was the exception - this state's pattern has been to not re-elect Senators. From 1970 - present, no Senator in this state except that one exception, has been elected more than once (or elected even once, if they were already serving due to being first elected before 1970).
no subject
For almost the entire period I'm talking about, both of SC's Senate seats were occupied by the same two Senators, Strom Thurmond and Fritz Hollings, who kept getting re-elected over and over. It's been less than a decade since either of their replacements got in, and both of them are still in (the one who's running for re-election this year, Jim DeMint, is polling ahead of his rival by more than 2-to-1, so he's certain to be re-elected).
Alaska's not it either, see above.
no subject
no subject
no subject