ext_28378 ([identity profile] bkdelong.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] cos 2010-11-02 02:30 pm (UTC)

Understood. So the basic gist is VOTE NO ON 2 because an outright repeal is destroying it with no guarantee of starting it from scratch per se to fix the problem, rather than actual reform of certain issues where communities are blocking 40B developments they don't like?

Is that a good summary of why "NO ON 2" ?

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting