cos: (Default)
cos ([personal profile] cos) wrote2006-01-27 09:10 pm

Rabit Hole Day

I haven't posted anything today that I don't believe is real in this world. But I haven't ignored Rabbit Hole Day. If you're one of my regular readers, you may already noticed that my LJ went down the rabbit hole today. What did I do?

(comments temporarily screened - a prize for whoever guesses before I unscreen?)

(unscreened: five winners, interestingly, all female. now what's the prize? hmmm)

[identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com 2006-01-28 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I noticed that you DID post. Twice, even! :)

[identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com 2006-01-28 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
(What's the deal with the wee image, anyway?)

[identity profile] queen-of-wands.livejournal.com 2006-01-28 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
you posted. twice. now make that three times in one day!

at least that seems topsy turvy to me.

do I get a prize?

[identity profile] shadesong.livejournal.com 2006-01-28 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Oooh! We get to pick our own prizes? :)

[identity profile] queen-of-wands.livejournal.com 2006-01-29 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
I'm trying to think of a livejournal appropriate prize. I like the idea you proposed elsewhere of sending food via lj. will it be able to deliver fish and chips?

[identity profile] ommango.livejournal.com 2006-01-28 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
posted thrice in a day?

[identity profile] shadesong.livejournal.com 2006-01-28 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
You posted more than once? :)
coraline: (Default)

[personal profile] coraline 2006-01-28 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
posting more than once in one day?
coraline: (Default)

[personal profile] coraline 2006-01-28 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
exactly :)
kirin: Kirin Esper from Final Fantasy VI (Skuld-computer)

[personal profile] kirin 2006-01-28 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
So, it has nothing to do with the 2-pixel by 1-pixel "t-rabbit.png" in this entry?

By the by, if you don't specify size arguments on your tiny images, they become totally non-hidden on friends pages that un-inline "large" images, because the code evidently assumes any image with unspecified extents might be large.