cos: (Default)
cos ([personal profile] cos) wrote2008-11-20 11:00 am

When the Mormons come to your door

Apparently some Mormons stopped by my house last week, when I wasn't home, so I heard about it from Valerie later. She was not aware that the Mormon church funded California's proposition 8, donating the bulk of the money to run ads in the final weeks; it's quite likely that it would not have passed without their help.

If I were home when they came, I would have asked about it. I don't necessarily presume that young canvassers agree with their church, but it played such a pivotal role in passing the gay marriage ban, and here they are canvassing for converts, so they're at least acting in support of it. Mormon canvassers are, as far as I can tell, always polite, so I'd be polite. I'd also make it clear that I believe their church is a terrible influence on the world and I actively advise my friends to avoid it.

If Mormons come to your door, remember to ask them about prop 8? I'm curious to hear what they say.

[identity profile] satyrgrl.livejournal.com 2008-11-20 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course, it is worth noting that banning polygamy was a condition of Utah's entrance into the Union, and likely it would still be practiced today had that not been the case.

[identity profile] barking-iguana.livejournal.com 2008-11-20 06:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree. But having made the change for what were political reasons, they had to justify it to themselves and their congregations as having been done for religious reasons. That has made them all the more emphatic in their revised orthodoxy. Given that this revision was about a century ago, I think it's quite misleading and ultimately counterproductive to imply that current LDS's association with polygamy requires them to take certain positions on other issues.
Edited 2008-11-20 18:33 (UTC)

[identity profile] benndragon.livejournal.com 2008-11-20 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
But afterlife polygyny is still doctrine - if you are male, your spouse dies, and you remarry, you will have two wives when you are in heaven. How does that fit into the larger picture?

[identity profile] satyrgrl.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I completely agree. I just also think it is counterproductive to imply, as no one here seems to but people often do, that LDS eliminated polygamy from its doctrine because church leaders saw the error of their misogynistic ways, because God told them to, or some similarly high-minded reason.

[personal profile] ron_newman 2008-11-20 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
When the Mormons first settled Utah, wasn't it still part of Mexico? I think their settlement predates the Cession by a couple of years.
Edited 2008-11-20 19:20 (UTC)

[identity profile] barking-iguana.livejournal.com 2008-11-20 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Sort of, and months rather than years. From Wikipedia's page on Utah (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah):
Brigham Young and the first band of Mormon pioneers came to the Salt Lake Valley on July 24, 1847. Over the next 22 years, more than 70,000 pioneers crossed the plains and settled in Utah...

In 1847 when the first pioneers arrived, Utah was still Mexican territory. As a consequence of the Mexican-American War, the land became the territory of the United States upon the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, February 2, 1848. The treaty was ratified by the United States Senate on March 10.
The war started in 1846, so the first Mormon settlers were actually crossing the border of enemy nations. Except neither country was actively administering the area, nor contesting it militarily.
Edited 2008-11-20 20:16 (UTC)