Note that it generally treats the "House version" as one thing, because the three bills that passed three different committees in the House are so similar. It does provide some helpful examinations of the differences between them on the details, but those aren't the kinds of things that have been big in public debate / in the news.
However, it very usefully also compares the hypothetical Senate Finance Committee version (which on September 18th was a proposal with many amendment votes to come), as well as "interest groups" and what the White House wants. So even though a compare and contrast of the four non-Finance health bills on the issues in the news would not have been as useful, this adds more and is quite useful.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 20:11 (UTC)However, it very usefully also compares the hypothetical Senate Finance Committee version (which on September 18th was a proposal with many amendment votes to come), as well as "interest groups" and what the White House wants. So even though a compare and contrast of the four non-Finance health bills on the issues in the news would not have been as useful, this adds more and is quite useful.