Date: 2009-12-07 21:45 (UTC)
I think it's pretty cool that his office and he were responsive to your call, and changed their position based on a constituent's concerns... but shouldn't he have looked up those numbers himself originally, before deciding against it?

I hold your opinion and research on politics pretty highly in my esteem and may very well go with your endorsement over the endorsement of others of Coakley. But I do want to understand the implications of this story a little better.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 22:43
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios