cos: (Default)
[personal profile] cos
There are a bunch of scary anti-gay marriage bills being considered, including one that would cancel all the marriages of same-sex couples already performed, and another that would remove the judges who voted for it. There are also a few good bills, like one that would repeal the 1913 law that makes it harder for out of state couples to get married in MA. The public hearing on all of these bills is tomorrow afternoon!

I posted the details here. If you're near Boston and care about this, please read that post and go to the hearing if you can. (I will unfortunately have to miss it, I'm in western MA and have a meetup to run in Amherst tomorrow evening)
Date: 2005-04-11 20:41 (UTC)

From: [identity profile] hermesbrain.livejournal.com
It seems to me that it would be most prudent to direct efforts against the consitutional amendment, primarily.

The other bills, while objectionable, probably lack the teeth of constitutionality (Or at least provide a much greyer area).

I'd think that a blanket impeachment of judges who supported the initial ruling would cause some serious constitutional concerns, as would canceling gay marriages already performed -- on the other hand, a constitutional amendment would be a serious problem.

The other bills look like a smokescreen -- and provide a useful way to draw the attention of opposing activists away from what really matters -- the amendment (which is the only thing that appears to me to be a potentially big deal).

I'd hate to see the amendment become law because of a divided opposition fighting all of the battles, instead of focusing resources on the most critical, and spilling over what's optional...

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 05:47
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios