cos: (Default)
[personal profile] cos
At Solarfest a couple of years ago, I attended a home energy efficiency workshop. One of the questions from the audience was about saving energy by not opening the refrigerator frequently, and his answer was: it doesn't really matter. I was just reminded of this when my housemate mentioned feeling bad about not planning ahead when she's cooking, so she opens and closes the fridge repeatedly. A lot of people think this wastes a lot of energy, and it actually doesn't.

The guy who spoke at Solarfest told us about some actual research that had been done: Same-model refrigerators were loaded with the same amount of food. A "control" fridge was left closed for several days, while the "experimental" fridge had its door opened far more frequently than even the most scatterbrained person would do in normal life, and held open for longer than people usually hold the door open. At the end, with the refrigerators cooled down to their set temperature, they compared the amount of electricity used by both (they'd had meters attached), and found the difference to be insignificant.

It makes sense if you think about it. Refrigerators cool the air inside, but cooling air isn't the point; the point is to transfer some heat out of the stuff that's in the fridge, and keep excess heat from getting back into the stuff. Keeping air cool is a means to an end.

Air itself has very little heat content, because it's so thin. Most of the heat a fridge is concerned with is in the much denser solid/liquid food. If you put warm food in, some of its heat will transfer into the cooler air, and the fridge will have to continuously cool that air until all of the excess heat has come out of the food, which happens slowly.

When you open the door, all you do is cycle a bit of cool air out, forcing the fridge to re-cool some air, but that takes very little energy. Since heat transfers much more slowly into solids, very little heat gets into your food while you have the door open. After you close the door, the fridge quickly re-cools some air, expending very little energy. There's hardly any extra heat to transfer out of the solid stuff, so that air stays cold. To really "waste" energy, you would need to do more than cycle a bit of air out. You'd need to take the cold stuff out of the fridge, and replace it with warmer stuff. But that's the reason you have a refrigerator in the first place.

If you want use your refrigerator more efficiently, don't worry about how often you open the door. Instead, if you have food items out that you plan to put back into the fridge, and that you don't need to warm up before you use them, put them back into the fridge before they have a chance to sit out for a while and get warm. Stuff matters much more than air.

Edit: Simplified way of thinking about it: What matters is the transfer of heat (not temperature) into the fridge; that's what it uses energy to get rid of. You can't easily move much heat into the fridge with air; you mostly do it with solids and liquids.
Tags:
Date: 2009-01-16 20:20 (UTC)

kirin: Stick to Coffee and Alcohol (CoffeeAndAlcohol)
From: [personal profile] kirin
And along those lines presumably just as big an effect is to be had from: if you need to refrigerate leftovers of a dish that's been cooked, let it cool to near room temperature before putting it in.
Date: 2009-01-17 15:55 (UTC)

mindways: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mindways
*nodnod*

Although I'd be wary of counter-cooling meat-containing dishes for too long; minimizing their time in the "comfortable for bacteria" temperature zone is important.
Date: 2009-01-16 22:22 (UTC)

From: [identity profile] rightkindofme.livejournal.com
My husband makes me do this. I wouldn't have thought of it. :D
Date: 2009-01-16 20:28 (UTC)

From: [identity profile] mzrowan.livejournal.com
I want to email this to the aunt who always yelled at me to know what I wanted before I opened the fridge. This seemed, to my young logical mind, an impossible feat. I dreamed of designing fridges with see-through doors to make us both happy.
Date: 2009-01-16 20:48 (UTC)

inahandbasket: animated gif of spider jerusalem being an angry avatar of justice (Default)
From: [personal profile] inahandbasket
Neato, thanks for sharing!
I'm quite curious about if/how this correlates to chest vs. upright stand-alone freezers, as I'd always heard that chest freezers are more efficient for pretty much this reason.
Date: 2009-01-16 21:13 (UTC)

From: [identity profile] japlady.livejournal.com
This goes with the fact that most efficient way to run a refrigerator is full. Even if you don't have a load of stuff to chill its suggested to fill it with bottles of water or some such,
Date: 2009-01-16 22:48 (UTC)

From: [identity profile] haddmatter.livejournal.com
Its more true if its full then empty but I agree.

Interestingly consumer reports recently did a study of fridges and found that if you haven't replaced your fridge in the last 4 years the efficiently gains on very new fridge is so huge that they will pay back the different in a few years which is amazing. Replacing the fridge in my new place is high on the list. I suspect the current one is from the 80s.
Date: 2009-01-17 06:46 (UTC)

From: [identity profile] pikake.livejournal.com
actually, one way to improve the efficiency of your fridge is very much underrated:

twice a year or so, it helps to vacuum the coils. ;}
Date: 2009-01-19 17:13 (UTC)

drwex: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drwex
That's incredibly reassuring. As the parent of two children who insist on standing around with the fridge door open staring at the contents as if their stares would magically make food appear, I do worry about hte amount of energy that gets wasted.

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 18:46
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios