Jul. 5th, 2011 17:16
Resident Writing
A story set in a particular place can show how well the writer knows that place. Sometimes, I think it goes to another level, where you don't just realize the writer knows the place really well, but that you're reading something that could only have been written by someone who had lived there. Even if you know nothing else about the writer, you know they've lived in the place where that story is set.
What comes to mind for me is Zodiac by Neal Stephenson. I had no idea Stephenson had ever lived in Boston when I first read it, but it dawned on during the first chaper. Not in a questioning, "huh, did he ever live here?" way, but as fact: "I didn't realize Neal Stephenson had lived in Boston. Huh."
Have you read something that made you realize the writer had lived in the place where it was set?
Any thoughts on what it is about the writing that can make this so evident?
What comes to mind for me is Zodiac by Neal Stephenson. I had no idea Stephenson had ever lived in Boston when I first read it, but it dawned on during the first chaper. Not in a questioning, "huh, did he ever live here?" way, but as fact: "I didn't realize Neal Stephenson had lived in Boston. Huh."
Have you read something that made you realize the writer had lived in the place where it was set?
Any thoughts on what it is about the writing that can make this so evident?
no subject
no subject
"The results have had people asking said writers whether or not they were actually locals, so my take on this is yes, you can write a city without having lived there."
Doesn't sound like a yes to me - it's too indirect to tell one way or the other (in that you're relaying what writers told you about what people asked them, rather than having talked to one of the readers directly yourself and been able to ask them about it.) Comparing to my example, for instance - it didn't make me ask whether Stephenson had lived in Boston, because I wasn't wondering whether he had - I just felt like I knew it, and I was more curious about when and where and such so I looked that up.
My impression is that all the research in the world isn't by itself sufficient to write something like what I described in this post, but it may be that all the research in the world plus a certain kind of writing skill may let someone do that without ever having lived there. Or, it may not. I lean towards "not" but I'm not sure.