cos: (Default)
Sunday was the 3rd aniversary of the largest terrorist attack in Boston in our lifetimes.

Okay, the terrorists were cartoon characters, and the attack was a fantastical illusion in the minds of the authorities, but it shut down buildings and highways, struck fear in possibly millions of people and hysteria in the media for a while, and Boston hasn't seen a real terrorist attack to top it yet.

My reactions on that day included incredulous hysterical laughter, and mounting annoyance and dismay which, over the next few days, turned more and more into anger at the city of Boston and the state of Massachusetts (and in particular, Mayor Menino and Attorney General Martha Coakley). A week after the craziness, I put my thoughts together and posted this:

What Does Random Panic Protect Us From?

Some of you probably read that back then, or when I re-posed the link on the first aniversary. If you missed it, or if you don't remember, please re-read it... and send a copy to your representatives? Because we're still overreacting to "terrorism" in absurd and nutty ways, and many people in government do it because they assume that all of us expect and demand it, and that if they don't do it they'll lose our support.
Tags:
Jan. 31st, 2010 17:12

Q&A

cos: (Default)
After the State of the Union, Obama accepted an invitation to go to the House Republicans' retreat in Baltimore, where he gave a short speech and then answered questions for more than an hour (transcript). Watch it, it's very good.

Audio on the Q&A is not good for the first ~2minutes, then they fix it.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
From CNN, about last weekend's CrisisCamps:
    (CNN) -- A weekend meeting of technology pros looking to help victims of the Haiti earthquake yielded some ready-to-roll projects and a few more nearing completion. Perhaps more important, participants say, the gathering produced a framework that could keep aiding disaster-relief efforts in the months and years to come.
    ...
    Results included a digital map to help relief groups in Haiti coordinate their efforts and applications for the iPhone and other smartphones, including a Creole-to-English dictionary.

There's going to be a CrisisCamp Boston here at ITA (by One Kendall Square) this Saturday (tomorrow) 9am-4pm. The wiki page has info, including a list of projects this camp plans to work on.

... and on that subject, here's a useful new tech tool for disaster response that you can help with from home with no technical skills: http://www.BeExtra.org/Haiti - it asks you to look at photos and see if the people match, to help locate missing people.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
[ Recap for people not in Massachusetts: Today is the general election to fill the US Senate seat vacated by Ted Kennedy last year. ]

Since I made it clear how much I don't like Martha Coakley, the Democratic nominee, I feel I need to say this: Please vote for her today.

Most of those things I don't like about her? Scott Brown's positions are as bad or worse. Whatever her tolerance for shoddy prosecutions and low regard for civil liberties protections... Brown thinks the president should just be able to declare someone guilty and avoid the whole "fair trial" process altogether, and as far as I can tell, torture is just fine with him.

Have you been frustrated at the way every decent piece of legislation Obama has asked for, has been hacked into bits in the Senate in strained efforts to get the support of Olympia Snowe or Joe Lieberman to get through the Republicans 39-member "filibuster every damn bill no matter what" block? If Brown gets elected, that block will grow to 40, and nothing will get past the Senate unless it can get both Snowe and Lieberman's support. Lieberman will become an even more unavoidable roadblock.

Health care: Here's what will happen if Scott Brown wins today's election: the US House will vote on the Senate's crappy bill as is, because it's better than passing nothing, and since the Senate has already passed it, that will be the only way to get health care reform through without going back to the Senate. The House's ability to demand improvements would likely collapse instantly as soon as a Brown election victory is announced.

Yeah, I still don't like Coakley, but all the good candidates in this election already lost last month. Sometimes you lose elections, it happens. Now, though, we determine just how much of a loss it will be.

Martha Coakley will champion equal rights for women and LGBT people, work for more health care improvements, support infrastructure investments for economic recovery, fight financial fraud and predatory banking practices, support Obama's policy of diplomacy and engagement while also supporting efforts to remove American troops from Afghanistan, and support clean energy legislation. Brown would be her opposite on all of those things.

Polls are open 7am - 8pm. Find your polling place at WhereDoIVoteMA.com.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
Frequently, I (we?) see some interview with or talk by or article about someone who has succeeded in some big way, where things that person did on the way to success, or how they grew up, are presented as, or implied to be, advice: Here are things you ought to do to succeed. Sometimes, it's not even an interview or talk or article, but just little factoids delivered on their own, as the pre-success doings of a successful person, specifically intended as "do this to succeed" pointers.

"Success" is a can of worms all its own, but lets assume for a moment some definition we can agree on, some people who have achieved something matching this definition, and a desire to match their achievement. If we find that a few people who "succeeded" in this way all did X* in their youth, what does that tell us?

It tells us that people who did X and then succeeded, did X. In other words, it tells us nothing at all. It's a tautology.

What if hundreds of thousands of other people also did X, and among them are thousands who wished for the same success, but failed? What if those thousands would have succeeded if only they hadn't done X? None of them succeeded, so we wouldn't hear about them.

If we can either survey the majority of all people who have had a specific kind of success, or we can take a truly random sample of them, and then find that having done X in their youth is something a disproportionate number of them have in commone, then it would be worth investigating these two hypotheses:
  • Doing X gives you a significant advantages in achieving this sort of thing.

  • The sorts of people who are likely to try this sort of thing, or likely to succeed at this sort of thing, also have a tendency to do X.

It's possible that both hypotheses are false, but we've at least established a reasonably likelihood that at least one of them is true.

But no random sample? No broad survey? Then the mere fact that someone successful did whatever it is they did, tells us nothing whatsoever about whether doing that thing helps you have that kind of success. It may even hurt your chances.

* Feel free to interpret X as literally X, if that amuses you.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
My department at ITA Software is looking to hire several people. I've been here since May and find it a fun place to work, and the boss & grandboss heading our groups are both great. The guy running this department is one of the few people I've worked for who would make me want to take a job somewhere just based on knowing I'd be reporting to him.

We've got openings for:
  • Some database people. Mostly Oracle and Postgres.

  • A couple of ops tools/build/release engineers who would do things like write and maintain tools we use packaging, testing, deploying, and monitoring software. Heavy Python use on that side of things.

  • What I do, which is not exactly "unix sysadmin" but close enough that it calls for the same sorts of people who'd do a sysadmin job. Operations/Applications administration, managing installations of software that was written at ITA. You don't handle the hardware at all, you don't configure the OS. Think of it like what a DBA does for databases, except that instead of databases you'd be dealing with very different (though just as complex) applications. We do things like monitoring, testing support, configuration management, upgrades, high availability, and so on.


ITA is near One Kendall Square, about 8 blocks from the Central Sq T stop and 6 blocks from Kendall.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
    The eighteenth century, if it is to have a coherent character, must be allowed to divest itself of strict chronological limits and wriggle itself into the period from 1660 to somewhere in the 1780s; that is, from the Restoration to the decade when the American Revolution triumphed, the French Revolution began, and the Industrial Revolution got underway with Cartwright's power loom and Watt's steam engine.
    [...]
    The term "nineteenth century" is another verbal convenience of some elasticity. If you want it to mean a century, you use it to cover the period 1815-1914. The quarter-century from Bastille to Waterloo, 1789-1815, is then fitted in as a sort of entr'acte between eighteenth and nineteenth, featuring a special performance by the French Revolution and Napoleon.

    -- Barbara Tuchman, Bible and Sword

[livejournal.com profile] lilairen's rant reminded me to post one of mine from about ten years ago that's come up again recently: What's with people pedantically claiming that this New Years wasn't the end of the decade, because technically decades start with years ending in 1?

Technically, any ten year period is a "decade". 1988 through 1997 was a decade. 1999 through 2008 was a decade. It actually doesn't need to even be a group of whole numbered years - decades start, and end, every day. The question isn't whether it was the end of a decade, because it obviously was; the question is which decade are we talking about when we say "the decade."

When it comes to centuries, the pedants have a point, because the way we name our centuries implies that we're counting them one by one from the beginning. While the years 1900 through 1999 were most certainly a century, "the twentieth century" is not quite the most accurate name for that exact set of years.

But decades? We don't see people calling them names like "the two hundred and first decade". You'd have to be daft to claim that the decades we referred to as "the twenties" or "the 1980s" must necessarily have begun in 1921 and 1981 rather than 1920 and 1980. Not only is it obvious what decade people mean when they say this December 31st was the end of "the decade", but the way we name decades is just as clear.

So, just to be clear:
- The 20th Century AD: 1901 - 2000 (which is a century)
- The 1900s: 1900 - 1999 (which is also a century)
- The 202nd Decade AD: 2011 - 2020 (which is a decade)
- The 2010s: 2010 - 2019 (which is also a decade)

- Any roughly 100-year period you name and describe in context: also a century.
- Any roughly 10-year period you name and describe in context: also a decade.

Next time someone says "the decade" didn't just end, ask them how often they've heard anyone talking about "the two hundred and first decade".
Tags:
cos: (Default)
Fun action mystery with a lot of good lines and satisfying scenes. Fits in pretty well with the canon Sherlock Holmes (a lot better than the Star Wars prequels fit in with the original trilogy, for example). Clever. Not amazing, but a good time.

Previews made it seem very violent. While it did have about as much fighting as the previews had led me to expect, the movie as a whole was a lot less focused on the fighting than I had expected.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
A comment I wrote on reddit got posted to "bestof", for the first time (after I mentioned the idea, in response to a commenter who said it was one of the best comments they'd ever read o reddit). Based on some of the responses it got, I feel like I really succeeded in what I was trying to say, and I'd like to get it out to a wider audience. To make sense of the comment, though, it helps if you first read the original post I was responding to: Someone confessing a blatantly racist outburst.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
When I made fun of Atlanta earlier this year, I hadn't yet heard of this crazy place. I suspect it of secretly being a corn maze concept taken too far, or something from a puzzle book.

[ Post title is a reference to some between-songs banter about West Virginia (mp3) by the Dry Branch Fire Squad ]
Tags:
cos: (Default)
In case you haven't made up your mind yet, or are just curious, I made another post in [livejournal.com profile] baystate about what I think the major issues contrast between Martha Coakley and Mike Capuano is.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
Several years ago, when the country was plagued with touchscreen voting machines that made re-counts impossible and gave no way to verify that their counts weren't buggy, Representative Rush Holt (one of the few scientists in Congress) was pushing a bill that would've required these machines to at least produce a paper printout at the time votes were cast, that voters could look at. While he - and I - much preferred paper ballots instead of voting by touchscreen, he didn't think he could get that passed, while this seemed to have a chance, and was better than nothing. Holt's bill had about 150 cosponsors, including multiple Republicans (Holt is a Democrat), but my Representative, Mike Capuano (Boston/Cambridge/Somerville/Chelsea) was not on the list.

I called Capuano's office to ask, and they told me he opposed it. Why? They weren't sure, so they said they'd find out and call me back, and not long after, they did call me back to explain.
What Capuano's objection was, and what I did with that information... )

Capuano's office thanked me for the call, and said they'd pass along everything I'd said to the Congressman.

Shortly after, Capuano co-sponsored Holt's bill.

I've had this story in the back of my mind for years, and am finally getting around to posting it now because Massachusetts is holding a special election tomorrow to elect a replacement for Ted Kennedy in the US Senate. Mike Capuano is running in tomorrow's Democratic primary, and I hope you'll vote for him. I've had several other interactions with him since this one, and he's changed my mind on a few things. I've found him to be effective, smart, progressive, great at constituent service, and great at his job in Congress, and I think he'd be a good replacement for Senator Kennedy. I hope that if you live in Massachusetts, you'll vote for him, and whether you do or not, you'll pass this on to people you know in Massachusetts.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
Yesterday, my housemate asked if Thanksgiving is a holiday all over the world, or mainly just here? We all knew that Canada has a Thanksgiving in October, but she had no idea if it's widespread in the rest of the world. I thought it was probably just here, and couldn't think of any other country that has it, but didn't know whether maybe a few others might... so I went searching the net.

Apparently, one other country in the world has a national Thanksgiving holiday. It's on October 25th, in between the Canadian (2nd Monday of October) and American (4th Thursday of November). Do you know which country, and what the holiday is commemorating?

Think of your answer. Then click here to check. Then come back and vote in my poll, and also leave a comment with your initial reaction once you found out (preferably before reading anyone else's comments).

[Poll #1490935]
Tags:
cos: (Default)
I found an old cardboard box of CDs that I hadn't gone through since several moves ago, that contained mostly CD-R's, demos, show recordings, pre-release albums from friends' bands, and the like, from the mid/late 90s. Unfortunately some of them were damaged - I think this box was in my trunk on a road trip a long time ago and soaked up some automotive liquid (antifreeze? wiper fluid?) from a leaky container. I've been able to restore some of them by washing them, though even most of those have some damaged tracks.

One that seems to have survived completely* (after washing) is "Bad Release: The Dead Opossum Sessions" by Oxytocin High. Which was their performance at WBRS that I recorded, and they possibly re-mixed then burned onto CD with track names and titles, and a nice printed label. Someone even entered all the track info into CDDB.

So I'm sitting here listening to [livejournal.com profile] lyonesse and [livejournal.com profile] ceelove singing songs they wrote, with instrumental accompaniment by [livejournal.com profile] coraline, [livejournal.com profile] nacht_musik, and a few of their friends. I can hear [livejournal.com profile] chaiya in the audience, and I know [livejournal.com profile] iabervon and [livejournal.com profile] veek are there.

I haven't listened to this in probably nearly a decade. But I used to sit in on some of their living room practices, and it's surprising how completely familiar every single song is. I didn't think I remembered their songs, and if you'd asked me yesterday I probably wouldn't have been able to recall any of them except maybe a title or two.

* One small skip in track 4, Ashes and Sighs.


[ Some of the other finds in this box: An early 4-track demo from January, and an early 4-track demo from Fluttr (before they became Fluttr Effect) which has some damage causing pops and hiss in the first ~10 seconds of each track ]
Tags:
cos: (Default)
We lost one battle: the awful Baucus-Grassley health reform bill passed the Senate Finance committee. It's the "base bill" for the Senate now. Hopefully many pieces of the far superior HELP bill will make it into the final legislation. Overall we're still in a good position, and the public option still has better-than-even odds. Unfortunately, chances are high that at least some poison from the Baucus-Grassley idiocy will get into the final legislation.

Hopefully, the calls we made over the past few weeks have influenced our Senators to fight harder to remove as much of that poison as possible from the Senate's final bill, and the calls and donations we made before that have influenced House progressives to stick to their guns and block anything from the Senate that doesn't have a public option.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
... Five women dressed in many colors are singing a rhythmic soundscape on the state. They bring it to a quiet, and silently place their wireless mics, in unison, on the wooden floor at their feet (clack-clack-clack-clack-clack). Slowly, one, then the others, tap their feet lightly, recreating the rhythm. They swoosh their thin, colorful scarves in the air in front of them, lightly almost-touching the mics in time with the music, adding a flowing windy sound as they begin to sing again...

I've seen several thousand live music performances, and the three times I saw Zap Mama stand out in my memory. They might possibly be the best band ever. Wikipedia has this:
    ... musical group founded and led by Marie Daulne. Daulne says her mission is to be a bridge between the European and the African and bring the two cultures together with her music. "What I would like to do is bring sounds from Africa and bring it to the Western world, because I know that through sound and through beats, that people discover a new culture, a new people, a new world." Zap Mama specializes in polyphonic, harmonic music with a mixture of heavily infused African instruments, R&B, and Hip-hop and emphasizes voice in all their music. "The voice is an instrument itself," says Daulne. "It's the original instrument. The primary instrument. The most soulful instrument, the human voice." They sing in French and English with deep African roots.

Actually they also sing in some African languages and in made-up sounds and nonsense syllables. Their use of vocal music pretty spoiled me for a capella. One song on their first album is a story about a drive: the rattling of the keys, the start of the ignition, the quiet roads, the sounds of passing on the highway, the crash, the ambulance... all without words in any language. On stage, I saw them act it out, be the car as they sang it.

Marie Dualne was born in the Congo to Belgian & Bantu parents, and grew up in Belgium with her Bantu mother after her father was killed; her music is very very much "world music", and deliberately so.

So, Zap Mama has a show at The Paradise in Allston tonight. Doors at 7pm, I guess the show is around 8:30.

Coming?

Edit: Paradise Rock Club, 967 Comm Ave, 02215. On the Green Line B branch. $22, 18+
Tags:
cos: (Default)
Boston people: Who wants to go to the NEFFA contra dance in Concord tomorrow evening? Wild Asparagus, one of my favorite contra bands, who play a bunch of dances at Falcon Ridge every year, are playing this Thursday's dance.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
Several people asked me for an update to my earlier post about what you can do if you want a public health insurance option passed. Sorry I've been slow. Now's the time to call, so read this today if you want to help.

Where We Are Now


Everything I wrote then remains true. Here's what has changed:
  1. I said the Senate Finance Committee would come up with a terrible proposal. Indeed, the Baucus-Grassley proposal was completed, and it is irredeemably awful.

  2. I said that the public option probably had the support of a majority of the House and Senate. Now we know that to be true; it has been independently verified by Democracy for America.

  3. I said that the media was misleading you by focusing on the Senate Finance Committee, since other committees were done and Finance was the only one where there was still some action. That's even more true in the past few weeks, and the press has made it seem as if the fate of reform lies in what amendments pass or fail in the Finance Committee. That's still false; the fate of reform lies in whether or not we prevent the Finance Committee's idiocy from becoming law.
  4. I said that our best strategy for good health reform legislation with a strong public option is to defeat the Baucus-Grassley proposal in committee, so that Finance passes no bill at all. That vote may happen this week.

If you want it, more detail about points #1 and #2 here behind the cut... )

What You Can Do


Briefly: Call Democrats on the Finance Committee and ask them to vote NO in committee on the Baucus-Grassley proposal (officially "America's Healthy Future Act").

Last time, I asked you to call and thank those Representatives who had signed a letter saying they would vote against final legislation without a public option. They stiffened the House's backbone, vs. the Senate, on this.

Now, the Senate is where we can make a difference: If we can prevent Finance from passing its awful bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will run out of time to wait for them, and will bring the much much better HELP Committee bill (with a public option) to the Senate Floor as the base legislation. If we can manage that, we head off that fight between the House and Senate, and nearly ensure a better bill becomes law. If we can't manage it, then things get harder; our odds for getting a public option would still be better than 50%, but they'd be lower, and all sorts of other bad stuff from the Finance Committee might make it into law too.

Finance has 13 Democrats and 10 Republicans. We can expect Republicans to vote no, but there's a risk that Olympia Snowe will vote yes. So, to be relatively safe, I think we need 4 Democrats to vote no. If Grassley and Enzi vote yes, we'll need 6 Democratic no votes, but if the proposal turns out to be so horrible that even Grassley and Enzi would vote for it, we shouldn't have much trouble getting some extra Democrats to oppose it.

Chuck Schumer (D-NY) submitted an amendment in committee to add a public option to the Baucus-Grassley bill. It failed, but 10 of the committee's 13 Democrats voted for it. Can we find 4 from among those 10, who will vote no on the whole bill?

Here's a list of Finance Committee members. Do you live in one of their states? Call! Tell your Senator's office that you think the Baucus-Grassley proposal is terrible and cannot be salvaged, and ask them if they'll commit to voting "no" on it in committee, so that the much better HELP bill can become the Senate's base bill.

Here are the ten who voted for Schumer's public option amendment:
  • Massachusetts: John Kerry - 202-224-2742

  • New York: Chuck Schumer - 202-224-6542

  • New Jersey: Robert Menendez - 202-224-4744

  • Delaware: Tom Carper - 202-224-2441

  • Michigan: Debbie Stabenow - 202-224-4822

  • West Virginia: John D Rockefeller - 202-224-6472

  • New Mexico: Jeff Bingaman - 202-224-5521

  • Florida: Bill Nelson - 202-224-5274

  • Washington: Maria Cantwell - 202-224-3441

  • Oregon: Ron Wyden - 202-224-5244
Tags:
Sep. 25th, 2009 22:50

QotD

cos: (Default)
"Come and join us in temporarily constructing selves that possess a community but no identity."

From [livejournal.com profile] aroraborealis's latest anonymous confessions post
cos: (Default)
Is the Internet melting our brains? - Salon book review / interview:
    By now the arguments are familiar: Facebook is ruining our social relationships; Google is making us dumber; texting is destroying the English language as we know it. We're facing a crisis, one that could very well corrode the way humans have communicated since we first evolved from apes. What we need, so say these proud Luddites, is to turn our backs on technology and embrace not the keyboard, but the pencil.

    Such sentiments, in the opinion of Dennis Baron, are nostalgic, uninformed hogwash. A professor of English and linguistics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Baron seeks to provide the historical context that is often missing from debates about the way technology is transforming our lives in his new book, "A Better Pencil."

    [...]

    I start with Plato's critique of writing where he says that if we depend on writing, we will lose the ability to remember things. Our memory will become weak. And he also criticizes writing because the written text is not interactive in the way spoken communication is. He also says that written words are essentially shadows of the things they represent. They're not the thing itself. Of course we remember all this because Plato wrote it down -- the ultimate irony.


Normally I'd post something like this on [livejournal.com profile] coslinks but I wanted to quote all of that, and I don't write more than a couple of lines beyond the link on [livejournal.com profile] coslinks. So I'll add this: A lot of the criticims I've heard over the years of things like LiveJournal or text messaging, have often made me think, "I bet this is the sort of stuff people said about telephones or postal mail when those were new."

I could just imagine people recoiling at the thought of having phones in every house because calling someone on the phone is such alower-quality act than dropping by their house for a chat. Which may be true, but misses the point: it looks at a new communication technology as if it were a mere replacement for something older, and is supposed to do the very same things. Compounded by the fact, of course, that when a form of communication is really new, people don't know how it's going to be used, they're still trying it out and figuring out the possibilities. And those who have partly figured it out can't easily convey what they've found to those who haven't used it that way yet, because it's an experiential sort of figuring out.

[ Though it does puzzle me when people who don't text, compare texting disfavorably to voice-calling. Yes, those are things typically done using the same device, but I should think the difference between them would be obvious. I'd expect people who don't text to compare it disfavorably with email, or instant messaging, or something like that. ]
Tags:
cos: (Default)
I'm thinking of going to this show:
    Truth Values
    One girl's romp through MIT's male math maze.

    Discover more than 30 characters, all portrayed by MIT graduate Gioia De Cari, as she discovers the elite world of math and science with both humor and insight.

    September 10 - 20, 2009
    Thu @ 7:30pm; Fri & Sat @ 8:00pm; Sun @ 2:00pm, $35

If I go it'll probably be one of the Sunday 2pm shows, September 13th or 20th. Or maaaybe the 18th or 19th in the evening. Comment if you might go on one of those dates.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
Last night, I submitted this as a letter to the editor to USA Today:
    For decades, private for-profit insurance companies have been spreading fear about "government run health insurance". Despite the fact that people on Medicare - run by the government - are more satisfied with their insurance than people on private insurance, the private insurance companies have been telling us that national health care wouldn't work, because the government can't run a good insurance system, and we're all better off with private insurance. Obama's plan puts their claims to the test, and it's time to put up or shut up.

    Obama proposes a compromise between a national single payer system, and the private insurance we have now: he wants to put a public health insurance option in the same market as private companies, to let people choose and see what works better.

    Insurance companies' complaints about "unfair competition" are a smokescreen. They want to mislead us into a conversation about how to be fair to insurance companies, while they continue being unfair to the American people.

    What the for-profit insurance companies are really saying is that they fear the government can run a better health insurance - that satisfies people more, and leaves us healthier, at a lower cost. They may be right. Congress owes it to us to create a public option so we can try it and find out. Stop worrying about the health of the insurance companies, and care for the health of the American people for a change.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
[context, in case you need it] Obama has proposed including a "public option" which would basically be single-payer health care, but coexist with private for-profit insurance. People or employers could choose the public option, just as they could choose any existing private plan. If it turns out to be better than private insurers, they'll either get better to survive, or they'll get smaller and we'll have national single payer, more or less.

So, this post is for those of you who want this public option to happen.

First: We're winning. We're ahead. Press coverage has been very misleading, for several reasons... )

Despite what it may seem from the news, a public option is >50% likely. On the other hand, it's not anywhere near 100% likely, so it can definitely use your help! And you can easily do some things that'll have a big effect on its chances.

If you're interested, here's what's happening in Congress, and why the actions I recommend below will matter. Or, you can skip the details, and just do them. )

We have two points of pressure to apply:
One: Support the House Progressives who have signed the letter saying they will vote No on any bill without a public option, so they stick to what they've pledged despite all the pressure they're likely to be under to back off.
Two: Try to get the Sneate Finance committee to stall and not pass a bad bill.

A word about supporting the Reps who signed the letter... here's Darcy Burner's plea, paraphrased: "When they do something lobbyists want, they get a big fat check, and a thank-you visit. when they do something we (progressives) want, sometimes they don't even get a single phone call!!" Darcy told me about one Representative who, when he voted against the FISA bill last year with immunity for warrantless wiretapping, got something like 50 thank you phone calls, and about $1200 in small donations. That seems like very little, yet she says he was so excited about it he's still bringing it up now. Remember, these are Reps who want to do that things we want them to do. We don't need to give them more money than the lobbyists do, we just need to validate them in doing what they're already doing because they want to. We need to make them feel that it really is appreciated, so they'll feel confident when under pressure. It only takes a few phone calls, and a few small donations (100 people giving $12 each, for example).

If you want this to happen, do these things this week:

  • Look at this list of House members who signed the letter and if yours is on it, make a quick phone call to say thank you.

  • Even better, if you can, make a small donation - even if it's just $10. And then - this is key - call the Representative to not only thank him/her, but also to say "I just made a small donation to you because you committed to vote No on health care reform if it doesn't have a strong public option." Imagine the effect it'd have on someone, who wants a public option, to know that people gave them money specifically because they said they'd vote this way. How can they back down now?

  • Is your rep not on the list? Donate to some others, and call them and tell them you gave money because of this.

  • Your rep not on the list? Find a Rep on the list whose district has someone you know in it, and get that someone you know to call them and say thank you. Find another, and another, and repeat.

  • Massachusetts people: John Kerry is on the Senate Finance Committee. He wants a public option. Call him and urge him to pledge to vote no in committee on any bill without a strong public option. Literally that: vote no in committee. It'd only take a few Senators to block the compromise from passing, and if the Finance Committee can't produce a bill, then the much better HELP committee bill will become the base bill on the Senate floor. Then theres no need for a fight between the Senate and the House, and we win.

  • Non-MA people: see if your Senator is on the Finance Committee.

  • Sign Democracy for America's petition and DFA/PCCC's advertisement for the public option. DFA is Howard Dean's organization, and his top focus these days is getting a public option passed.


Edit: To find a Senator or Representative's phone number:
- Google their name
- Go to their house.gov or senate.gov web site, and click "contact"
- Call their DC office, the one with a 202 area code. Local offices usually focus on constituent services, DC offices handle legislation.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
You've probably seen some things that say "printed on recycled paper" in small print at the bottom.

The Greenpeace free drink tickets at tonight's reception at Netroots Nation say:
    Printed on 100% PCW Recycled Process chlorine-free paper using vegetable based inks on a wind powered press.


Take that.

P.S. Fun aside, it's really nice that the Pittsburgh convention center has clearly labelled paper and plastic/glass recycle bins next to every trash can, and the box lunches they served us came in compostable dishes & boxes. Also I hear they use air from the basement to cool the convention hall.
Tags:
cos: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] cos, watching Jessie-cat wash herself: "I wonder how I can get her to wash herself more often?"

Valerie: "Put butter all over her fur! That's a horrible idea, don't do that, I take it back, I dreamt that a rat ate a mouse."
Tags:
Page generated Mar. 18th, 2026 12:24
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios